![]() |
“When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.” - John Muir, Sierra Club founder, 1892 |
![]() |
| Explore, enjoy and protect the planet | ||
|
> Home > 2009 Survey on Climate Change for Virginia State Legislators 2009 Survey on Climate Change for Virginia State Legislatorsby Tyla Matteson A short survey on climate change was distributed to all 140 state legislators in January, with a January 30 deadline. We received responses from 21 Delegates and 7 Senators, and as we stated to the legislators, we are posting their names and responses. Click here to view the details of the 2009 survey (pdf). With a 20% return, we have a sampling of elected officials across the board, from various localities in Virginia, rural and urban, to include criteria of gender, race, and age. We will be happy to accept legislator’s surveys past the deadline. The survey began with a paragraph about the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) explaining their Fourth Assessment report of 2007, done by 2500 scientific experts, with the consensus that global climate change is most likely human caused, translating to 90% likely. The report says changes include more frequent heat waves, droughts, heavy precipitation events, shrinking of arctic sea ice, and sea level rise from thermal expansion, melting ice caps and glaciers. Below are the five questions and a recap of the 28 respondents:1. Is it clear or not clear that significant climate changes have occurred in the last decade? Clear or very clear – 25, Not clear – 2, Some changes clear – 1 2. Are global climate changes occurring primarily as a result of human activity? Yes – 25, No – 2, Some changes are human causes – 1 What is the probability (in percentage) that climate change is human caused? 12 did not provide a number, or used “high” or “do not know” 0% - 1, 50-69% - 3, 70-89% - 5, 90-100% - 7 Of the 25 who replied Yes to this question, the average was about 82%. 3. Is immediate action needed this session to deal with climate change? Yes – 20, No – 2, other responses, such as “within budget constraints” – 6 4. Would you oppose legislation in the Virginia 2009 General Assembly session, if certain terms are used in the wording of legislation, such as “global warming”, “climate change”, or “greenhouse gases”, as occurred in the 2008 session? No – 24, Yes – 1, other responses – 3 5. How many of your constituents have you heard from on the topic of climate change? Zero to four – 4, Five to ten – 5, Ten or more – 19 Remarks:The respondents represent Republicans (6), Democrats (21), and Independents (1). The two most staunch skeptics on climate change were Republicans, although other Republicans concurred with the IPCC findings in their responses. Of interest is the correlation of those who are skeptics or somewhat skeptical with a lesser number of constituents who have contacted them on climate change. Likewise, a higher number of constituents who have contacted a legislator correlates with a legislator having more concern about climate change and more likely to take immediate action. In response to this far-fetched idea, Ross Gelbspan wrote that other researchers predict seeding the atmosphere would trigger a global drought, after studying the effects of the eruption of Pinatubo in 1991. Ross Gelbspan is the author of well-known books on climate change, The Heat is On, Boiling Point, and maintains the website, www.heatisonline.org. “There are a host of bills to encourage increased investments in clean or "green" businesses plus regulations on those businesses which are not. Many initiatives come from the Governor's Climate Change Commission. The Commission based its recommendations on the view that global warming is a settled matter of fact and decided that Virginia should pursue strategies ahead of whatever initiatives the Obama administration might consider. You may want to question those assumptions. I do.” Of further interest is a posting to the Virginia House Republican Caucus blog on January 26, 2009: A few quotes follow, directed to Brian Moran, one of several candidates running for Governor of Virginia: “Former Delegate and current Gubernatorial candidate, Brian Moran is against coal energy. Why, you ask? Moran believes that a proposed coal plant in Surry County will cause global warming and harm the Chesapeake Bay. Now, it doesn't take a genius to realize that coal is a natural resource that has not been linked to any environmental harm. In fact, it is a clean burning alternative fuel source…..Coal is good, Brian, and it does not cause global warming like your good friend, Al Gore presumes.” Gee, as one of the other bloggers replied, even the coal industry doesn’t believe burning coal is good for the environment! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||